Discussion about this post

User's avatar
DAVID DEMILO's avatar

Paul: You are correct about the two plausible explanations for Trump officials to be ignorant of previous incursions, but both are troubling.

As you point out, at least the DNI should be apprised of this. Isn't that the whole point for creating this position in the first place, especially after 9/11 – to synthesize analysis from the different intelligence agencies and determine what the President needs to know and when? Didn't we credit the 9/11 attacks in part to "failure of imagination" and cross-functional awareness, deeming jihadi visa violations and pilot school too insignificant to report up the chain?

On the second point, Mark Milley has already confessed that would warn his Chinese counterpart if Trump were to order to a nuclear strike.

In both cases, the concept of civilian chain-of-command seems violated.

Expand full comment
DAVID DEMILO's avatar

Paul: The public safety argument is ridiculous. They tracked it while it was traversing Alaskan and Canadian airspace over snowy wilderness, from which we would have had some chance of recovering data.

Instead, they waited until the balloon completed its espionage mission and shot it down over salt water, which will make it impossible to recover data.

Maybe they'll hire CrowdStrike to examine the flash memory.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts