The World Cup is coming to the U.S. next year. In this Washington Post op-ed, Will Leitch suggests that the unpopularity of the U.S. soccer team among its fan base might mar the event. He writes:
The team, which just got smoked by Switzerland in a friendly on Tuesday [of last week], is on a four-game losing streak, its longest in 18 years. . . .
But there is a larger crisis for the team, too — something that strikes at the core of what it means to support a national team in the United States right now. What does it mean to cheer for an American team on a global stage in the current political climate? Against teams from Latin America? I dunno: How do you feel about it?
I feel good about it, thank you. However, Leitch doubts that this is the case with the fan base that has supported the U.S. team in the past.
Who comprises that base? “Hipster patriots,” says Leitch:
Thousands of young urbanites, with their tattoos and their beards and their craft beers, [who] would head out to national team games dressed like Benjamin Franklin or bald eagles while screaming “I Believe That We Will Win!” at the top of their lungs — a sort of ironic nationalistic cosplay that, in the end, did actually make you feel a little patriotic.
The little bit of patriotic feeling associated with the U.S. soccer team started to erode with the rise of the MAGA movement, says Leitch. And now, with the team performing poorly, he believes it’s a thing of the past.
He’s probably right. But what does it say about hipster patriots if a four-game losing streak and unhappiness with our politics are enough to make them turn away from the national soccer team?
A four game losing streak, incurred while playing second and third stringers, is nothing. (And by the way, the U.S. team has won two matches in a row since Leitch published his column.) The Washington Nationals just ended an 11-game losing streak. The Washington Wizards had two 16-game losing streaks this season. No true sports fan would stop rooting for these teams on that account.
Nor should discontent with the Trump administration cause soccer fans to turn away from, or against, the U.S. team. I couldn’t stand Presidents Obama and Biden. Yet, I rooted for our World Cup teams in 2010 and 2014, and was disappointed when the U.S. failed to qualify for the 2022 World Cup.
Hipster patriots would probably counter that the Trump administration is one or two standard deviations less normal than those of Obama and Biden. But even if this is true, why should it affect how one views U.S. national teams? It’s not the fault of the players or coaches that America elected Trump. In fact, a number of U.S. soccer team members have the kind of immigrant background that appeals to hipsters.
I can think of only one answer to my question. Many American leftists are so consumed by politics that they let their views affect realms of their lives that, rationally, have no connection with politics. For these folks, politics and ideology are everything. Nothing exists independently of them.
This by the way, is the attitude of a fascist. As Mussolini wrote in The Doctrine of Fascism:
For the fascist, everything is in the state, and no human or spiritual thing exists, or has any sort of value, outside the state. In this sense fascism is totalitarian, and the fascist state which is the synthesis and unity of every value, interprets, develops and strengthens the entire life of the people.
If American hipsters are going to stop supporting American national teams because they think the country is on the path to fascism, the least they could do is to shed their own fascist-tending attitudes.
"For the good of the game" is a phrase that many US soccer coaches and officials end their letters with. If you love this game, as I have all my life, you don't give a damn about the countries, even as you support your own national team.
During the 2002 World Cup my son (then 12) would get up a 4:30 a.m. to watch the team live. On one such early morning we watched with trepidation as they took on Portugal, with their star Luis Figo - one of the three teams considered to have a shot at the finals.
That morning the USA pulled off a 3-2 defeat of Portugal, stunning the world of soccer. I drove to work as usual after the match all hyped up, listening to a local Bay Area sports talk show to get the reaction. "Oh wow, the US beats Portugal - does anyone care?" wisecracked he host. "No," said former Raiders coach John Madden, their guest. "Soccer is not an American sport and it's a stupid game for losers."
That attitude has been with us for a long time, long before MAGA or hipster were things. In a narrow sense, Madden was right: it's not an American game. There are probably no American boys who played this sport competitively who haven't played along side young men from all over the world. That is feature, not a bug.
It doesn't faze the millions of Americans who play the game or support their kids during ungodly hours of travel and competition, but it's always there.
That 2002 US team, a mix of pros with European experience and exciting young upstarts like Landon Donovan and Michael Beasley, eventually lost in the quarterfinals against a powerhouse German side led by the veteran goal keeper Oliver Kahn, who managed to hide a ball that slid over the line behind him, sealing a 1-0 win for Germany.
Germany went on to lose to Brazil, led by Roberto Carlos, the dazzling Ronaldinho and the legendary Ronaldo, in the finals. The trainer of my son's team, a Bolivian, said, "Sometimes we need Brazil to remind us how to play this game."
The US men that year showed us that we can do it. It was a great moment of national pride and love of the game. Parenthetically, it also produced the best-ever World Cup ad. There wasn't a single US player in the ad, but Elvis Presley provided the theme.
https://youtu.be/XG0aCa9-bLI?si=wsOlplanhUZ2ychp
Patriotism is not conditional. Just as Thomas Friedman's Zionism is conditional therefore he is not a Zionist, the "Hipster Patriots" are in fact not patriots at all. So they can get lost.