Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Paul Mirengoff's avatar

I don't think this story shows the Democrats to be in any serious trouble. As far as I can tell, no Democrat called for the use of this form. It was the brainchild of some company trying to be "sensitive."

In any event, a Democrat running for Senator in a swing state in 2026 or for president in 2028 can easily disagree with this New Jersey policy, assuming it even comes up. And voters would believe his or her disagreement because the policy is, indeed, insane.

In addition, this isn't the kind of LGBTQ issue that upsets voters to the point it would influence their vote. The policies that resonate are ones that seem grossly unfair (boys competing in girls' sports); that intrude on privacy (boys in girls' locker rooms and bathrooms); and that place safety or health at risk (men in women's prisons, boys in girls' locker rooms and bathrooms, boys competing in certain girls' sports, and certain surgeries).

The New Jersey policy doesn't fall into any of these categories. It's stupid and annoying, but that's all.

I should add that a Gallup poll taken after the 2024 election showed that transgender issues ranked 23rd in importance to voters. And, again, I believe those who considered it important were focused on the kinds of policies described in my second paragraph.

At the margin, Democrats running in tough aces need to get on the right side of hot button cultural issues like boys in girls sports and in their bathrooms. This, they can do, and already seem to be doing it.

Expand full comment
CjB's avatar

I think examples such as the New Jersey law draw ridicule to the whole woke agenda and cause people to wonder: if the Democrats are so obviously clueless on a fundamental matter as biology, why shouldn’t the rest of their agenda be questioned?

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts