Ringside at the Reckoning

Ringside at the Reckoning

Share this post

Ringside at the Reckoning
Ringside at the Reckoning
Jackie Robinson's legacy is not under attack

Jackie Robinson's legacy is not under attack

Properly understood, that legacy fits nicely with the war on DEI

Paul Mirengoff's avatar
Paul Mirengoff
Apr 16, 2025
∙ Paid
7

Share this post

Ringside at the Reckoning
Ringside at the Reckoning
Jackie Robinson's legacy is not under attack
2
Share

Today is the 78th anniversary of Jackie Robinson’s big-league debut. Major League Baseball is commemorating the event in various ways, including every player and coach wearing Robinson’s number, 42. MLB has done this every year since 2004.

Yet, the subtitle of this article in the paper edition of today’s Washington Post declares that Robinson’s legacy is “under fire” because of the Trump administration’s “unprecedented crackdown on diversity.”

Before examining the Post’s case that Robinson’s legacy is under fire (spoiler alert, it isn’t), let’s note that there is no crackdown (unprecedented or otherwise) on diversity. Nothing Trump has done evinces a quarrel with diversity. Rather, the administration’s quarrel is with diversity for diversity’s sake — diversity that awards jobs and benefits to people based on their skin color, not their merit.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Paul Mirengoff and Bill Otis
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share