Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Douglas Levene's avatar

I had thought that DOJ only brought obstruction cases against J6 participants who had personally engaged in some violent act, not necessarily assaulting a police officer, but something. I thought DOJ did that to avoid conflicts with the interference with Congress statute, the one the Code Pink people were charged with. Is that not true? Are there any obstruction cases being brought against people who did nothing more than trespass?

Expand full comment
Jim Dueholm's avatar

The double standard between the January 6 protestors and those picketing outside Supreme Court justices' homes is even worse than it looks. The January 6 obstructers are criminally liable for obstruction only if they obstructed with a corrupt intent, and it's hard to see any motive beyond the obstruction itself. The SCOTUS protestors can be prosecuted if they picketed in an attempt to change a justice's mind, with no need to show corrupt intent. Jim Dueholm

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts