Discussion about this post

User's avatar
William Otis's avatar

There were better choices for sure, but at least Vance survived Yale with his brain intact.

Expand full comment
PETER SCHNEIDER's avatar

I think this selection is problematic.

1. It doesn’t expand the base at all, eg bring in some folks who may have been fence sitters

2. Vance did pretty poorly in 22, all things considered.

3. Complicates Senate math should Trump win.

4. While Vance has a compelling personal story he mucked things up in 22 (see # 2) and can’t afford to again. He is a bit Quayle like.

5. Trump could have put a mortal lock on the election by picking someone who could expand the ticket and, in an election where VP might matter a lot more than usual because of age, made the country feel like there was someone with proven good judgment who could step in. Vance’s age and relative inexperience mitigate against that.

6. But Trump’s made his choice. I just think he’s giving Biden unnecessary air.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts