The Washington Post began its report on this weekend’s EU parliament elections with this: Early forecasts in the European Parliament elections on Sunday showed voters punishing ruling centrists and throwing support behind far-right parties. . . . The article goes on to use the term “far right” nearly 20 times. But the Post never tells us what it means by a “far-right party.”
How many times do we have to do this? The Washington Post is not a newspaper. A newspaper even if it has an editorial bias attempts to report the news based on a semblance of reality. The Washington Post like the NY Times is a leftist propaganda outlet. All printed material will be filtered through not bias bit a specific agenda to promote a leftist view of reality that is often at odds with actual reality. The people have caught on. It's why the Post is going bankrupt. "Far Right" is the narrative term for Europeans who don't want a hard leftist agenda imposed on them from Brussels and don't want their countries given over to Islam.
How many times do we have to do this? The Washington Post is not a newspaper. A newspaper even if it has an editorial bias attempts to report the news based on a semblance of reality. The Washington Post like the NY Times is a leftist propaganda outlet. All printed material will be filtered through not bias bit a specific agenda to promote a leftist view of reality that is often at odds with actual reality. The people have caught on. It's why the Post is going bankrupt. "Far Right" is the narrative term for Europeans who don't want a hard leftist agenda imposed on them from Brussels and don't want their countries given over to Islam.
Great post. And when's the last time the MSM called a leftist group. no matter how far out there, as the far left Jim Dueholm