Recall during her confirmation hearing she would not state what a woman is and worse when asked what her judicial philosophy was she refused to answer. The first one tells you she is an ideologue who is perfectly willing to deny objective reality in service to her political ideology. The second tells you she was hiding something, so what was she hiding? She was hiding the fact her judicial philosophy is Marxist Critical Law Theory. Critical Law Theory was created by Derrick Bell it is also the father of Critical Race Theory. The foundation of CLT assumes the constitution was created for the express purpose of oppressing minorities specifically Americans of African descent and therefore is illegitimate and all laws derived from it are illegitimate. That’s right we now have a Supreme Court justice who is a Marxist and believes the constitution is an illegitimate document. Does anyone really believe she will make rulings based on the document she believes is illegitimate? When she refused to say what a woman is and refused to state her judicial philosophy every single Republican senator should have voted no on confirming her.
Wasn't it Jackson who, as a nominee, was asked what a "woman" is and claimed she didn't know?
Ketanji Brown Jackson is the third Justice Jackson on the Supreme Court. The third time is definitely not a charm. Jim Dueholm
Recall during her confirmation hearing she would not state what a woman is and worse when asked what her judicial philosophy was she refused to answer. The first one tells you she is an ideologue who is perfectly willing to deny objective reality in service to her political ideology. The second tells you she was hiding something, so what was she hiding? She was hiding the fact her judicial philosophy is Marxist Critical Law Theory. Critical Law Theory was created by Derrick Bell it is also the father of Critical Race Theory. The foundation of CLT assumes the constitution was created for the express purpose of oppressing minorities specifically Americans of African descent and therefore is illegitimate and all laws derived from it are illegitimate. That’s right we now have a Supreme Court justice who is a Marxist and believes the constitution is an illegitimate document. Does anyone really believe she will make rulings based on the document she believes is illegitimate? When she refused to say what a woman is and refused to state her judicial philosophy every single Republican senator should have voted no on confirming her.